T1 mapping of the prostate using Single-Shot T1FLASH and MOLLI MRI Techniques: Comparison of artifact burden and image quality.

PURPOSE: To assess artifact burden and image quality of different MRI T1 mapping techniques of the prostate. METHODS: Participants with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) were prospectively enrolled from June-October 2022 and examined with multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI; 3 T scanner; T1wi, T2wi, DWI und DCE). T1 mapping was performed before and after administration of gadolinium-based contrast-agent (GBCA) using (i) a modified Look-Locker inversion (MOLLI) technique and (ii) a novel single-shot T1FLASH inversion recovery technique. T2wi, DWI, T1FLASH and MOLLI sequences were systematically examined regarding prevalence of artifacts and image quality using a 5-point Likert-Scale. RESULTS: A total of n = 100 patients were included (median age: 68 years). T1FLASH maps (pre-and post-GBCA) showed metal artifacts in 7% of cases and susceptibility artifacts in 1%. For MOLLI maps, pre-GBCA metal and susceptibility artifacts were documented in 6.5% of cases each. MOLLI maps post-GBCA showed artifacts in 59% of cases resulting primarily from urinary GBCA excretion and GBCA accumulation at the bladder base (p < 0.01 versus T1FLASH post-GBCA). Image quality for T1FLASH pre-GBCA was rated at a mean 4.9+/-0.4 and for MOLLI at 4.8+/-0.6 (p = 0.14). Post-GBCA image quality was rated at a mean 4.9+/-0.4 for T1FLASH and at 3.7+/-1.1 for MOLLI (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: T1FLASH maps provide a fast and robust method for quantification of T1 relaxation times of the prostate. T1FLASH is suitable for T1 mapping of the prostate following administration of contrast agents, while MOLLI T1 mapping is impaired through GBCA accumulation at the bladder base leading to severe image artifacts and reduced image quality.

T1 Mapping of the Prostate Using Single-Shot T1FLASH: A Clinical Feasibility Study to Optimize Prostate Cancer Assessment.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T1 mapping using T1FLASH for assessment of prostate lesions. METHODS: Participants with clinical suspicion for prostate cancer (PCa) were prospectively enrolled between October 2021 and April 2022 with multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) acquired on a 3 T scanner. In addition, T1 mapping was accomplished using a single-shot T1FLASH technique with inversion recovery, radial undersampling, and iterative reconstruction. Regions of interest (ROIs) were manually placed on radiologically identified prostate lesions and representative reference regions of the transitional zone (TZ), benign prostate hyperplasia nodules, and peripheral zone (PZ). Mean T1 relaxation times and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (b = 50/b = 1400 s/mm 2 ) were measured for each ROI. Participants were included in the study if they underwent ultrasound/MRI fusion-guided prostate biopsy for radiologically or clinically suspected PCa. Histological evaluation of biopsy cores served as reference standard, with grading of PCa according to the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP). ISUP grades 2 and above were considered clinically significant PCa for the scope of this study. Histological results of prostate biopsy cores were anatomically mapped to corresponding mpMRI ROIs using biopsy plans. T1 relaxation times and ADC values were compared across prostate regions and ISUP groups. Across different strata, T1 relaxation time, ADC values, and diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]) were compared using statistical methods accounting for clustered data. RESULTS: Of 67 eligible participants, a total of 40 participants undergoing ultrasound/MRI fusion-guided prostate biopsy were included. Multislice T1 mapping was successfully performed in all participants at a median acquisition time of 2:10 minutes without evident image artifacts. A total of 71 prostate lesions was radiologically identified (TZ 49; PZ 22). Among those, 22 were histologically diagnosed with PCa (ISUP groups 1/2/3/4 in n = 3/15/3/1 cases, respectively). In the TZ, T1 relaxation time was statistically significantly lower for PCa compared with reference regions ( P = 0.029) and benign prostate hyperplasia nodules ( P < 0.001). Similarly, in the PZ, PCa demonstrated shorter T1 relaxation times versus reference regions ( P < 0.001). PCa also showed a trend toward shorter T1 relaxation times (median, 1.40 seconds) compared with radiologically suspicious lesions with benign histology (median, 1.47 seconds), although statistical significance was not reached ( P = 0.066). For discrimination of PCa from reference regions and benign prostate lesions, T1 relaxation times and ADC values demonstrated AUC = 0.80 and AUC = 0.83, respectively ( P = 0.519). Discriminating PCa from radiologically suspicious lesions with benign histology, T1 relaxation times and ADC values showed AUC = 0.69 and AUC = 0.62, respectively ( P = 0.446). CONCLUSIONS: T1FLASH-based T1 mapping yields robust results for quantification of prostate T1 relaxation time at a short examination time of 2:10 minutes without evident image artifacts. Associated T1 relaxation times could aid in discrimination of significant and nonsignificant PCa. Further studies are warranted to confirm these results in a larger patient cohort, to assess the additional benefit of T1FLASH maps in conjunction with mpMRI sequences in the setting of deep learning, and to evaluate the robustness of T1FLASH maps compared with potentially artifact-prone diffusion-weighted imaging sequences.